zmttoxics wrote:Weird that they would do that since S11x still works... I wonder if its just a "not officially supported" kind of deal....
skywriter wrote:this sells more hardware and pushes customer into higher maintenance costs. Sun was too good to customers; it's why they lost in the long run.
skywriter wrote:Most people were in deep denial concerning Oracle's prerogatives when Oracle first bought Sun.
kurkosdr wrote:So, let me get this straight: There are currently NO sparc workstations that can run the latest version of Solaris?
This is why corporations shouldn't be allowed to be bought by larger corporations, unless they are bankrupt. Just because that last CEO of Sun got tired and wanted to retire, an entire computer category was lost.
Users browsing this forum: Yahoo [Bot] and 1 guest