Itaniums? sgi to use Dorado line to boost workstations?

Open discussion on or around SGI; software/hardware related posts should go in the appropriate subforum.
Forum rules
Any posts concerning pirated software or offering to buy/sell/trade commercial software are subject to removal.
User avatar
SiliconBunny
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:32 pm
Contact:

Unread postby SiliconBunny » Tue Apr 19, 2005 1:11 am

LaLora wrote:
Would NASA have even bothered to talk to SGI for Columbia if it was Origin 3000 based? No, of course not


In case you still don't know - "Columbia" was almost entirely "donated" to NASA by SGI. They rushed to set it up quickly right before November Top 500 HPC list, so they could be on or near the top of the list for Altix "promotion" purpose.


I'm well aware of it - in what way does that change the fact that Columbia is still very technically advanced? Or that SGI would not have landed the deal if it was O3k instead of Altix?

I'd be very surprised if any of the bidders submitting quotes for Columbia asked for even 50% list price.

Once you leave the mass market toys and get to the big iron (16 way and upwards) no-one, ever, pays list price. At all.

'Headliner' systems like Blue Gene/L and Columbia are always *heavily* subsidised by the vendor. TOP500 is bragging rights, nothing else.

However, SGI could have given the kit away - for free - if it was MIPS based, and NASA still wouldn't have gone for it.

There's no loyalty in IT, and no-ones going to install a system that's significantly slower than the others on offer - especially not for a major installation like that.

LaLora wrote:"Columbia", various sources estimate, at that time represnted around 10% of ALL global Itanium2 processor sales. When somebody has to "donate" 10% of all global sales of a new processor just to convince customers about their new system then that is more a sign of weakness for that company than some big success.


You appear to be confusing SGI with a mass market player like HP, Sun, or IBM.

They are not. They never have been, and they never will be. They are a niche player. They rule that niche, but it's still a niche.

Itanium is a niche CPU - anyone who believed it would be a mass-market solution can come to talk to me - I have a bridge to sell them. The market for Itanium is tiny - just as the market for MIPS or vector based systems is tiny.

The Earth Simulator was more than 10% of global vector-based systems sales when it was installed - doesn't mean it wasn't technically impressive, or that NEC were giving away kit out of desperation to stir the market.

High end system sales are very different from bulk desktop or 4 way server sales. Trying to quote numbers or systems shipped is just a nonsense in that space - that market doesn't work like that.

LaLora wrote:
No, of course not - they would have gone to IBM.


It's quite funny that you wrote this line because:

"..If Itanium2 failes, SGI will be bought by IBM and their engineers will be used to boost new IBM systems with their experince.."

..was (or similar) written just a few months ago at HPC forum by someone close to IBM or SGI. Then, about a week later, I checked again at that forum and saw a very wierd thing - the posted message, and even all messages posted under (actually almost all messages on forum) were deleted (it's quite empty now), by administrator(s). Lots of people from industry come to visit TOP 500 site, sometimes even SGI has ads there, and SGI probably demanded for those messages quoting that they'll be bought by IBM be deleted.
It probably is not a secret in industry and business world any more that SGI will be bought by IBM in the end.


You don't honestly believe that? I mean, that's some serious tin-foil-hat paranoia going on there.

A post in a web forum does not a business decision make. Definitely not when it would involve hundreds of millions of dollars.

IBM will not buy SGI. At all. It's just not going to happen. Quite apart from the fact that SGI is dwarfed by IBM - an utterly insignificant player - IBM already have products in every area that SGI do.

Why on earth would IBM spend money to buy a non-competitive niche player when they already have higher volume sales from competing products?

Do you think IBM sales lose sleep at night when thinking of Altix vs. their POWER5/Linux business?

There's no business justification for it at all.

And that's not even touching on all the regulatory pain IBM would incur from the US goverment. Look at the hopes SGI had to jump through when buying Cray.

Governments don't like to see their technology suppliers being bought - it doesn't give them the warm fuzzies. They'd much rather bail them out with lucrative research grants and large scale projects. Look at how badly HP have screwed government departments over with their laughable Alpha 'road-map'.

The only people who might have had an interest in buying SGI would have been Sun - they need the high-end scalability. But not even Sun were willing to do a complete about face and swallow Itanium as their server CPU - so they jumped into bed with Fujitsu.

LaLora wrote:The primary force of any high-tech company is always (and ONLY) innovation, new technology, helping new scientific research and so on. Once you loose that - it's over. You can't reinvent another HP zx6000 or claim to be serious scientific supercomputing company while posting news on your website that should attract religion-decision based shareholders and customers!


Which was what my post was all about.

SGI are still innovating, they're still ahead of the pack, and they therefore still have their little niche cornered. The day SGI stop innovating, you'll know about it, because they'll go under.

In the meantime, their stuff is technically excellent. The fact that it's no longer MIPS/IRIX should not blind any of you to their continuing innovation and - most importantly - their continued survival in a very harsh market.

Cheers,
TOM
--
"Tell them we are not Gods, but SysAdmins, which is the next best thing,"

User avatar
colin
Posts: 453
Joined: Sat Feb 07, 2004 5:43 pm
Location: Lubbock, Texas
Contact:

Unread postby colin » Tue Apr 19, 2005 5:30 am

schleusel wrote:
Dubhthach wrote:As for the workstation, i find it interesting that they are going with twin AGP 8x, surely dual PCI-E 16x would have been better (well from a SLI point of view)


Prism still uses AGP 8x too. One can only guess why this is the case. Either it was already too long in development when the PCI Express hype started or they took the cheap route and simply built upon the AGP midplane of Onyx4 Ultimate Vision they already had.
Dorado is likely a repackaged Altix 350/Prism just like Tezro being a repackaged Origin 350/Onyx 350 IP.

Prism uses SGI's new Tio I/O chip which supports multiple AGP 8x interfaces.
Onyx4 UltimateVision used PCI to interface AGP cards at 1x.

It sounds like Dorado is just a workstation version of Prism.

Unless you need the NUMAlink kungfu, a dual Opteron + dual PCI-E 16x board will probably do just as well...

User avatar
SiliconBunny
Posts: 15
Joined: Tue Apr 12, 2005 1:32 pm
Contact:

Unread postby SiliconBunny » Tue Apr 19, 2005 6:51 am

schleusel wrote:Prism still uses AGP 8x too. One can only guess why this is the case.


Alexis Cousein did some posts in the filth that is comp.sys.sgi detailing why this was.
It basically boiled down to the long development lead time for stuff like this (ie. AGP 8x was there and usable, PCI-E was a glint in some working group's eye) as well as stable and well-tuned chipsets surrounding the AGP implementation of the ATI cores.
I believe there was also some development issues/costs associated with the XBOW->PCI->AGP bridges - as in AGP is just more crap on top of PCI, whereas PCI-E is fundamentally quite different.

Cheers,
TOM
--

"Tell them we are not Gods, but SysAdmins, which is the next best thing,"

User avatar
Antnee
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Unread postby Antnee » Sat Apr 23, 2005 1:33 pm

Well, personally I'm looking forward to Dorado. Looks like it's gonna be the cheapest SGI yet, and they did a pretty good job with O2 as the cheapo, who knows what they can do with this! I may just have to buy one.

I notice a lot of people will scream for Tezro, but will slag off the IA64 machines. Hey, they're powerful as hell, and rumour has it that the caches on the new Itaniums will be HUUGE! OK, so Dorado is supposedly gonna have 3MB cache per chip, but that's cool for now. I'm just as pissed that we've lost MIPS and IRIX on the roadmap, but that doesn't mean I can't still use em. I still got 4 perfectly working IRIX/MIPS machines here, and just cos the new machine will be IA64/LINUX, doesn't mean they'll stop running.

I for one will look forward to having a play with Dorado, and if I like it, I'm having one ASAP!

Go ahead, flame away, I can take it! :twisted:
Image

User avatar
GeneratriX
Posts: 4250
Joined: Tue Oct 21, 2003 2:07 am
Location: Rosario / Santa Fe / República Argentina

Good Attitude!

Unread postby GeneratriX » Sat Apr 23, 2005 2:11 pm

Antnee wrote:Go ahead, flame away, I can take it! :twisted:


:lol: :lol: :lol:
Good attitude! ;)
Cheers!

User avatar
Thaidog
Posts: 182
Joined: Mon Dec 13, 2004 11:19 pm

Unread postby Thaidog » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:55 am

Dubhthach wrote:As for the workstation, i find it interesting that they are going with twin AGP 8x, surely dual PCI-E 16x would have been better (well from a SLI point of view)


Actually for the time being AGP is still more optimized than PCI-E. This is especially true for Linux. AGP has a facility, the aperture that can be marked as "write-combined" with video memory and system memory that has been allocated to the aperture. PCI-E lacks the aperture function which makes it perform slower even at 16X in certain situations. PAT (Page Table Attribute) support is making it's way in to the 2.6 kernel but has not been released yet. PAT functionality can decrease the system bottleneck associated with heavy PCI-E/memory bus dependent traffic. Once it's fully supported PCI-E will be a lot faster than what it is now.

User avatar
Antnee
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Unread postby Antnee » Sun Apr 24, 2005 10:58 am

I've got to ask though... is anyone actually considering getting one of these things?

Should find out more about it when SGI show it on Tuesday as I understand it
Image

User avatar
Cory5412
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Unread postby Cory5412 » Sun Apr 24, 2005 3:31 pm

Antnee wrote:I've got to ask though... is anyone actually considering getting one of these things?

Should find out more about it when SGI show it on Tuesday as I understand it


I'm interested in seeing what kinds of software you can load on it, and how much it costs, before I say whether or not I'd want one...

As I understand it, SGI is pretty bad at listing specific applications that you can run on your hardware... It's almost as though people just get SGI hardware because it's awesome ;)

At least Sun lists an included productivity suite :P ;)

Do you think that the release of this new Dorado workstation might end up shaking out some of the newer Octane2's and older Fuels? Even shaking out a few O2+ units at the very end of what some people probably consider useable in a professional or university environment would be a good thing for the hobbyist community.
I [heart] the Performer Town Demo

GIJoe
Posts: 898
Joined: Sat Mar 29, 2003 11:44 am
Location: Germany

Unread postby GIJoe » Sun Apr 24, 2005 4:59 pm

didn't several early fuel configs showed up in the 2nd hand market recently? also i believe it's only a matter of (short) time until fully loaded octane2's show up more often. quite some of these should have been replaced by tezro's till now.

the question is, will there be enough quantities of these machines to allow prices to drop into the "affordable" range in general? i somehow have a hard time to believe they sold alot of their newer desktops. but then, it was/is surprising to see how many low-end octane2's were dropped when considering that a lot of the irix->pc transition already took place in the late nineties.

so i'll try to stay optimistic. i'd prefer a dual-600 octane2 all day over a fuel for several reasons though, hope that is the more cost-effective route as well ;)


edit: as for ia64-based machines: to me these seem not very interesting as of now. only reason for me to use irix/sgi is software-availability anyway. makes a nice addition to the windows software world.
a lot of graphics related software has vanished already. i don't see them coming back onto a niche platform unless sgi manages to offer something truly unique (again). and computers without software, well... that's something for the collectors, if at all.

User avatar
zizban
Moderator
Moderator
Posts: 1373
Joined: Sun Dec 21, 2003 5:59 pm
Location: Cheshire, MA
Contact:

Unread postby zizban » Sun Apr 24, 2005 5:06 pm

Unless SGI offers something super compelling, some awesome reasons to buy one, I wont. I just don't see the benefit (yet).

User avatar
Antnee
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Unread postby Antnee » Sun Apr 24, 2005 5:18 pm

Does anyone know if this system is likely to be able to run any of the existing IA64 software? Having not paid much attention to Altix or Prism, I have no idea how hard it is to port software from existing platforms. For example (and heaven forbid but you understand where I'm going with this...) would you be able to run Windows 2003 64-Bit with suitable drivers? Sorry, but it's the only example I can come up with off the top of my head, what with not having a clue about what software is available on Itanium!
Image

User avatar
Cory5412
Posts: 567
Joined: Fri Jan 16, 2004 6:08 pm
Location: Arizona
Contact:

Unread postby Cory5412 » Sun Apr 24, 2005 8:38 pm

Hmm... If it runs Linux or Windows (yeah, I know...) It might be interesting. For me, the big draws will be price, a software bundle, and the famous SiliconGraphics design. ('Course, it'll have to be absolutely stunning for that one to count.)
I [heart] the Performer Town Demo

User avatar
Antnee
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Unread postby Antnee » Mon Apr 25, 2005 3:19 am

Well it's definitely gonna be running Linux since SGI haven't shown any signs of porting IRIX to IA64. The Altix and Prism both run Linux, although SGI are porting individual components; XFS etc.

Should find out tomorrow I guess!
Image

User avatar
Tech^salvager
Posts: 101
Joined: Thu Jan 06, 2005 10:48 pm
Location: Leesburg, GA
Contact:

Unread postby Tech^salvager » Mon Apr 25, 2005 8:09 am

hmm knowing me I would try to put windows on another partition if I had one of those things.

User avatar
Antnee
Posts: 554
Joined: Thu Feb 17, 2005 3:26 pm
Location: Nottinghamshire, UK
Contact:

Unread postby Antnee » Mon Apr 25, 2005 2:36 pm

:evil:
Image


Return to “SGI: Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests