Additional operating system/hardware discussion (Windows, Linux, *BSD and others)
Forum rules
Any posts concerning pirated software or offering to buy/sell/trade commercial software are subject to removal.
Posts: 5871
Joined: Wed Jul 19, 2006 8:37 am
Location: Renton, WA


Unread postby SAQ » Sat Sep 26, 2015 8:47 am

Looking around I noticed that Netatalk is currently at 3.1.x, but all of the Linux distros package 2.2.x. My suspicion is that this is your common, garden-variety "you're not my friend anymore" Linux hissyfit, (especially as BSD packages 3.1), but thought I'd check in to see if anyone knew anything more in depth. 3.1 has some advances over 2.2, and unfortunately some things require Linux and I'd like to minimize admin overhead.
"Brakes??? What Brakes???"

"I am O SH-- the Great and Powerful"

:Indigo: :Octane: :Indigo2: :Indigo2IMP: :Indy: :PI: :O3x0: :ChallengeL: :O2000R: (single-CM)

User avatar
Posts: 2176
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:12 pm
Location: Sunny So Cal

Re: Netatalk?

Unread postby ClassicHasClass » Sat Sep 26, 2015 10:30 am

No idea. I use an old EtherTalk-era Netatalk on my 1.5.2 NetBSD IIci. (1.6 wrecked EtherTalk.)
smit happens.

:Fuel: bigred, 900MHz R16K, 4GB RAM, V12 DCD, 6.5.30
:Indy: indy, 150MHz R4400SC, 256MB RAM, XL24, 6.5.10
:Indigo2IMP: purplehaze, 175MHz R10000, Solid IMPACT
probably posted from Image bruce, Quad 2.5GHz PowerPC 970MP, 16GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.4.11
plus IBM POWER6 p520 * Apple Network Server 500 * RDI PrecisionBook * BeBox * Solbourne S3000 * Commodore 128 * many more...

Return to “Miscellaneous Operating Systems/Hardware”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest