Page 2 of 2

Re: DOSBox performance

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2017 3:51 pm
by jirka
Thanks, will try it as soon as possible.

Re: DOSBox performance

Posted: Sun Nov 26, 2017 2:40 am
by jirka
Works nicely. Just tested it on my O2. Many thanks!

Re: DOSBox performance

Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2017 9:52 am
by heavyfuel
The first post mentions core=simple which is not fast... Does the dynamic core work on non-x86 systems or is it for x86 only?

It should be much faster since it dynamically recompiles the code instead of intepreting it instruction by instruction like normal/simple...

Instead of setting fixed cycles I'd try cycles=max when the maximum available performance is desired.

Re: DOSBox performance

Posted: Sat Dec 02, 2017 7:38 am
by jirka
heavyfuel wrote:The first post mentions core=simple which is not fast... Does the dynamic core work on non-x86 systems or is it for x86 only?


The "auto" and the "full" are not available. Just the "simple", the "normal" and the "auto" ones. And there is no noticeabe speed difference (is seems to me that the "simple" gives a slightly better speed).