SGI as a daily driver

Open discussion on or around SGI; software/hardware related posts should go in the appropriate subforum.
Forum rules
Any posts concerning pirated software or offering to buy/sell/trade commercial software are subject to removal.
vegac
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:34 pm
Contact:

SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby vegac » Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:02 pm

I'm curious how many people (if any) use an SGI as their daily computer.

What I mean isn't just a computer you toy with daily, but actually as your main machine you go to for...whatever it is computer related that you're doing.

Moreover, for those that do, what do you think the gaps are that make it challenging (and if you would want to but can't, what is it you're missing that keeps you from doing so).

User avatar
foetz
Posts: 5431
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby foetz » Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:20 pm

i use my sgis for whatever they can do. for the rest i use osx.

as for the challenges (pun partially intended :D ), i don't think that changed much compared to back when they were still sold. they were never intended to be consumer allround machines so there's always been something missing here and there
r-a-c.de

User avatar
nongrato
Posts: 123
Joined: Thu May 15, 2014 5:24 am
Location: SPb, RU

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby nongrato » Wed Jan 07, 2015 5:49 pm

This is my dream to get a good quad cpu Tezro or a dual cpu Ultra 45 and scrap my regular PC.
Image

hamei
Posts: 9890
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:10 pm

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby hamei » Wed Jan 07, 2015 6:47 pm

vegac wrote:I'm curious how many people (if any) use an SGI as their daily computer.

One here ...

Moreover, for those that do, what do you think the gaps are that make it challenging (and if you would want to but can't, what is it you're missing that keeps you from doing so).

It would be nice to have something that worked with .doc files, not counting Open Orifice. That thing is a p.o.s. Ted is okay and people don't even know when you send them rtf's because Windows conveniently hides the extension, but getting docs is a pain.

A not-online docx converter.

A spreadsheet program that can read xls files. Again, Open Orifice exists so we're not tied to the railroad tracks but something better would be good.

Standard request is a browser ... in the big picture maybe, maybe not. Flop 3 does crash and it's not very fast but could be PaleMooned or something to be better. But for sites like Nekochan that don't use bullshit tracking chasing and spying, it works fine. And I don't want to go to tracking spying sites anyhow. Those sites are like coke without the pussy, you feel so cheap and used afterwards, not going there is the better choice.

Nekoware really has a ton of stuff and running a compiler is not such a big deal. If I had to name any single thing that would be the most help, maybe a newer and better gtk2 would be the biggest. Anything newer than the industrial revolution wants gtk2 ...

All in all, Irix works fine and we have most of what's necessary. Occasionally I have to steal the Assist's Win2k* computer to fill out some online pdf (wtf are those people thinking ?) but in general, no problemo with Irix.

*Okay, I admit it. It's now Windows Server 2003. After eight years it needed a rebuild and I wanted to try Mr Canavan's rdesktop so we moved on to Server 2003. rdesktop works nicely. The newest Fireflop does not. What a piece of shit. Stick to v 28 if you know what's good for you, and even that has some very braindead decisions. This has informed my thinking of Fireflop on Irix - the newer flops are not good. The Mozilla Corporation has totally destroyed Phoenix, thank you so much. It was good while it lasted.
from the moment I could talk I was ordered to listen ...

User avatar
jirka
Posts: 131
Joined: Tue May 04, 2004 7:55 am
Location: Czech Republic
Contact:

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby jirka » Thu Jan 08, 2015 12:54 pm

vegac wrote:I'm curious how many people (if any) use an SGI as their daily computer.


I still have an O2 (R10k/250 Mhz, 1 GB of RAM). Of course, for things like the online banking I have to use a non-sgi computer (Linux laptop).

I use my O2 for writing of articles and presentations in the LaTeX, also for simple sketches, graphs and images (XFig, Gnuplot) and for lightweight FEA (I have my own finite element code which I use) and so on.
I use the gcc 4.7 for software development. My codes still use OpenGL 1.2 and Gtk+ 2.x so there are no main isues for me.

I also have several older DOS-based portables (a PSION MC600, HP LX boxes,...) and I use the CKermit to communicate with them via the serial port (software and data backups and so).

Also use my O2 for some general things (image viewing, gaming,...).

My problems:

1. For WWW I prefer the Links browser. When it isn't enough then I use the Firefox. But for many sites I have to use a Linux laptop :-(

2. The OpenOffice is slow and old but the LibreOffice on a modern Linux box is not much better.

3. The Octave 2.x (which is available here at nekochan.net) is too old for me.
:O2: :Indy: :Indy:

vegac
Posts: 732
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2003 12:34 pm
Contact:

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby vegac » Thu Jan 08, 2015 1:20 pm

It really seems a fast browser is the #1 requirement...

That then opens up the ability to use most sites (including online document editing if needed, webmail, etc. etc.)

Pity Dillo is so limited...it's certainly got speed on its side.

commodorejohn
Posts: 204
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby commodorejohn » Thu Jan 08, 2015 2:52 pm

vegac wrote:Pity Dillo is so limited...it's certainly got speed on its side.

Unfortunately, the fact that Dillo is so limited is why it's got speed on its side. We put such absurd demands on web browsers now, with elaborate layouts and absolute mountains of Javascript even on a lot of pages that would be perfectly fine without it, that it's basically impossible to have a browser that's both efficient and full-featured enough to make a lot of modern webpages happy. There have certainly been some heroic efforts (yo, ClassicHasClass!) but ultimately the choice comes down to efficient-but-limited versus full-featured-but-beastly...
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/MT-32/D-10, Oberheim Matrix-6, Yamaha DX7/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini, Ensoniq Mirage/SQ-80, Sequential Circuits Prophet-600, Hohner String Performer

"'Legacy code' often differs from its suggested alternative by actually working and scaling." - Bjarne Stroustrup

hamei
Posts: 9890
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:10 pm

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby hamei » Thu Jan 08, 2015 6:44 pm

vegac wrote:It really seems a fast browser is the #1 requirement...

That then opens up the ability to use most sites (including online document editing if needed, webmail, etc. etc.)

Pity Dillo is so limited...it's certainly got speed on its side.

I'll swim against the current here and disagree. In fact, it's getting to where the lack of a "modern" web browser is almost an asset. The web is such a pile of shit these days that being limited in that respect is not a bad thing. Have you looked at the domain names for the first five pages of a search recently ? 80% of them are frauds.

btw, webmail works fine and the hitch with document editing is in the pdf reader, not the browser. There's not much decent available on Windows for that, either.

Here's the deal - if you don't want to live in 1984, then don't use the telescreen. Google is not your friend.

I do wish Mr Axatax would return with his Mplayer work.
from the moment I could talk I was ordered to listen ...

User avatar
foetz
Posts: 5431
Joined: Mon Apr 14, 2003 4:34 am
Contact:

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby foetz » Thu Jan 08, 2015 8:08 pm

commodorejohn wrote:
vegac wrote:Pity Dillo is so limited...it's certainly got speed on its side.

Unfortunately, the fact that Dillo is so limited is why it's got speed on its side. We put such absurd demands on web browsers now, with elaborate layouts and absolute mountains of Javascript even on a lot of pages that would be perfectly fine without it

couldn't agree more. here's a random example that makes one think wtf? :P :
Attachments
js_wars.png
r-a-c.de

hamei
Posts: 9890
Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 5:10 pm

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby hamei » Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:32 am

commodorejohn wrote: We put such absurd demands on web browsers now ...

What do you mean, "we", white man ? I doubt that you could find five actual users who want this disgusting shit. It's all created by slavering Madison Avenue greedmeisters trying to jam their worthless crap down our throats. Or twelve-year-olds who just discovered Visual Basic and adsense and should have got a paper route instead.
from the moment I could talk I was ordered to listen ...

User avatar
ClassicHasClass
Posts: 1094
Joined: Wed Jul 25, 2012 7:12 pm
Location: Sunny So Cal
Contact:

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby ClassicHasClass » Fri Jan 09, 2015 12:50 am

commodorejohn wrote:
vegac wrote:Pity Dillo is so limited...it's certainly got speed on its side.

Unfortunately, the fact that Dillo is so limited is why it's got speed on its side. We put such absurd demands on web browsers now, with elaborate layouts and absolute mountains of Javascript even on a lot of pages that would be perfectly fine without it, that it's basically impossible to have a browser that's both efficient and full-featured enough to make a lot of modern webpages happy. There have certainly been some heroic efforts (yo, ClassicHasClass!) but ultimately the choice comes down to efficient-but-limited versus full-featured-but-beastly...


Yeah, hacking on Fx some more for Irix is on my round tuit list, but TenFourFox has highest priority (which, speaking of JavaScript, should have a full Ion implementation for PowerPC by Fx38 if I can get my skates on).
smit happens.

:Fuel: bigred, 800MHz R16K, 4GB RAM, V12, 6.5.30
:Indy: indy, 150MHz R4400SC, 256MB RAM, XL24, 6.5.10
:Indigo2IMP: purplehaze, R10000, Solid IMPACT (full hinv pending)
probably posted from Image bruce, 2x2x2.5GHz PowerPC 970MP, 8GB RAM, Mac OS X 10.4.11
plus IBM POWER6 p520 * Apple Network Server 500 * HP C8000 * BeBox * Solbourne S3000 * Commodore 128 * many more...

User avatar
Ryan Fox
Posts: 405
Joined: Mon Dec 20, 2004 12:03 pm
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Re: SGI as a daily driver

Unread postby Ryan Fox » Mon Jan 12, 2015 12:54 am

I mainly use my Onyx2 these days.. Mostly messing around in Maya , the odd modeling project that eventually ends up on either an Apple or windows desktop.. Looking forward to making use of the DIVO though
MAYA, nut-
:Octane2: :Octane2: Octane 2 R14k 600 V12 4GB, Octane2 R14K 600 V10 1GB ,
:Onyx2: :Onyx2: Onyx2 IR3 4GB Quad R14K 500 DIVO, Onyx2 IR Quad R12K 400 2GB,
:Indigo2: SGI Indigo 2 R8K75 TEAL Extreme 256MB,
:Indigo2IMP: SGI Indigo 2 R10K 195 Solid Impact 256MB, MAX Impact Pending
,
Apple G5 Quad, NV Quadro 4500 + 7800GT, 12GB RAM
Sun Blade 1000 Dual 900 XVR 1000 4GB
Sun Blade 2000 Dual 1200 XVR 1200 8GB


Return to “SGI: Discussion”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest