hamei wrote:You're trying to bait me ...
No, not really.
Just kidding. I was going to answer "In my pants !" but thought someone might take offense
I agree that it was a very lame article.
What an ignorant jerk .... but that's what we expect from Ziff-Davis. Computer Currents* ran some intelligent comparisons while we were all waiting for Chicago. That's when i decided to go for OS/2. Their factually-based conclusion was that everything about OS/2 was better except that it had higher hardware requirements.
But since you could see that memory prices would drop considerably in short order, well .... going with Windows 95 would have been a mistake. Win95 was a joke compared to OS/2.
I'm remembering debating the pros and cons of OS/2 and those new PS/2 machines with some of my college chums after the announcement, and suddenly I am feeling very, very old.
Hey, if you remember riding Dinny through the jungles you'd be old ! 25 years is nothing. It's well within the margin of error for the creation of Earth, in some circles
* Is Gigglebytes stashed anywhere on the innernet ?