vishnu wrote:
There is no 3D acceleration but for 2D it must be better than XVR, right?
Not necessarily.
vishnu wrote:
Or else why would they have bothered...?
The crazy high 2048x2536 resolution & 10-bit grayscale (8-bit is more common) are features probably not found elsewhere in Sun's hardware.
The linked web page specifically mentions medical and pre-press applications. Those are both areas where image quality/accuracy is far more important than performance. If it's actually certified for use in medical applications expect it to cost a fortune!
Note also that the web page says it's an ATI RV100 graphics processor. That's the same chip from the ATI Radeon 7000 and (IIRC) the Sun XVR-100. That also suggests to me that's it's not a performance-oriented graphics card but a feature-rich one instead.
_________________

Sun SPARCstation 20, Blade 2500
HP C8000