PymbleSoftware wrote:
I don't recommend the 1500s due to flakey power supplies.
I've had more trouble with my 2500's PSU than either of my 1500s, but I guess that could be luck. The good part is that the 1500 and 2500 use standard ATX boards, so I assume the PSUs are also just standard ATX.
ChristTrekker wrote:
Good point is that it's a LOT faster than my Ultra 5. If someone were to give me one, I sure wouldn't turn it away.

Those ATA disks in the Ultra5/10 are painfully, painfully slow. If you're close to NJ, I have a Blade 1500 red you can have, as they seem to have no resale value. When compared to the selling prices of those Ultra 25s that were on eBay (all three sold for over $1000 despite being the absolute lowest spec possible--single proc, minimum RAM, lowest-end framebuffer, single disk), I'd still sooner get behind a Blade 1500.
_________________

HP C8000, IBM RS/6000 43p 150, and lots of Suns in
my collection