nekonoko wrote:Uploaded neko_bind-9.6.1-P1.tardist to /beta. Update addresses CVE-2009-0696.
Just upgraded, looks to be running fine.
Thanks a lot for being so reactive with security updates !
Uploaded neko_bind-9.6.1-P1.tardist to /beta. Update addresses CVE-2009-0696
nekonoko wrote:Added the following to /beta:
joerg wrote:indyman007 wrote:Is thunderbird noticably faster than FF 2?
Thunderbird cant be used for webbrowsing and with FF2 its hard to send and recive E-Mail, so your question doesnt make any sence
While I prefer the Firefox user interface, it's been my experience that Seamonkey gives better overall performance on single processor boxes. There's a brief explanation of my reasoning in this thread: viewtopic.php?f=7&t=16719853&p=7290783&#p7290783indyman007 wrote:I was thinking of Sea monkey
recondas wrote:nekonoko wrote:Added the following to /beta:
It's up and running on the IRIX box du jour <an Onyx 350 IP>.
I ran the new FF beta through a fair number of bookmarks, except for those features that have been previously documented as not being FF/IRIX friendly, I haven't seen any issues.
The Octane is down for it's quarterly dust-out maintenance. As soon as it's back up I'll give the new SM a spin.
nekonoko wrote:I appreciate that Hopefully we have more than one user
Spent six hours of my Friday on these :/
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 2 guests