Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

For friendly off topic discussion not covered in a forum above.
Forum rules
No politics, please.
User avatar
zahal
Posts: 847
Joined: Fri May 27, 2005 11:43 am

Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby zahal » Wed Jan 03, 2018 10:27 am

INTEL needs to sell new processors. What do they do? Make your current processor unsafe and 30% slower!

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-01- ... amd-surges

"Fundamental design flaw". Class action suit lawyers must be salivating over this one!
Sitting in a room.....thinkin' shit up. :evil:

:O2: 400MHz R12k - :320: Dual 600MHz PIII - HP Alphaserver DS15 - Digital DECstation5000/133 - Dell T3500 - Apple G4 Cube dual 500MHz/GF6200 - Newton Messagepad 2100 - Apple PowerBook 2400c/G3@240 - Apple PowerMacintosh 6100/66 - Apple PowerMacintosh 6500/G3@500MHz - Apple Workgroup Server 9150/120 G3@280 - Apple Macintosh IIfx - Apple Macintosh LC475 (OC Full 040 33MHz) - Apple Macintosh Color Classic (Full 040 40Mhz Mystic upgrade) - Sun Cobalt Cube 3 - EBOX 3300A-JSK - Tadpole RDI UltraBook IIi - Compaq Armada 4120 - Digital HiNote Ultra II - HP OmniBook 425 - HP 200LX - Crossbeam C12

User avatar
commodorejohn
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby commodorejohn » Wed Jan 03, 2018 10:58 am

This was down to the IME or I'll eat my hat.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/SH-09/MT-32/D-50, Yamaha DX7-II/V50/TX7/TG33/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/ARP Odyssey/DW-8000/X5DR, Ensoniq SQ-80, E-mu Proteus/2, Moog Satellite, Oberheim SEM

User avatar
jan-jaap
Donor
Donor
Posts: 5019
Joined: Thu Jun 17, 2004 11:35 am
Location: Wijchen, The Netherlands
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby jan-jaap » Wed Jan 03, 2018 11:35 am

commodorejohn wrote:This was down to the IME or I'll eat my hat.

Start eating, it has something to do with speculative execution from userspace resulting in leaking information from more privileged protection rings and/or defeating KASLR : https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/0 ... sign_flaw/

But it's got to be good. The anger can almost be tasted in this comment from LKML:

Code: Select all

2) Namespace

   Several people including Linus requested to change the KAISER name.
   We came up with a list of technically correct acronyms:

     User Address Space Separation, prefix uass_
     Forcefully Unmap Complete Kernel With Interrupt Trampolines, prefix fuckwit_

   but we are politically correct people so we settled for

    Kernel Page Table Isolation, prefix kpti_

   Linus, your call :)
:PI: :Indigo: :Indigo: :Indy: :Indy: :Indy: :Indigo2: :Indigo2: :Indigo2IMP: :Octane: :Octane2: :O2: :O2+: Image :Fuel: :Tezro: :4D70G: :Skywriter: :PWRSeries: :Crimson: :ChallengeL: :Onyx: :O200: :Onyx2: :O3x02L:
To accentuate the special identity of the IRIS 4D/70, Silicon Graphics' designers selected a new color palette. The machine's coating blends dark grey, raspberry and beige colors into a pleasing harmony. (IRIS 4D/70 Superworkstation Technical Report)

User avatar
Trippynet
Donor
Donor
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:22 am
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby Trippynet » Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:04 pm

zahal wrote:INTEL needs to sell new processors. What do they do? Make your current processor unsafe and 30% slower!


Not mine, replaced my Core i5 system with an AMD Ryzen last month 8-)
Systems in use:
:Indigo2IMP: - Nitrogen: R10000 195MHz CPU, 384MB RAM, SolidIMPACT Graphics, 36GB 15k HDD & 300GB 10k HDD, 100Mb/s NIC, New/quiet fans, IRIX 6.5.22
:Fuel: - Lithium: R14000 600MHz CPU, 4GB RAM, V10 Graphics, 72GB 15k HDD & 300GB 10k HDD, 1Gb/s NIC, New/quiet fans, IRIX 6.5.30
Other system in storage: :O2: R5000 200MHz, 224MB RAM, 72GB 15k HDD, PSU fan mod, IRIX 6.5.30

User avatar
Raion-Fox
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1597
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:01 pm
Location: near King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby Raion-Fox » Wed Jan 03, 2018 12:07 pm

MIPS is unaffected :p

I do not buy AMD because I cannot take the performance hit (Benchmarks of Ryzens show abysmal single thread performance compared to Haswell Xeons) and because I do not wish to support their poor quality chips.

That all being said, I'm glad I'm buying a Talos. Because AMD still has issues including the Security Processor which cannot be disabled (the BIOS switch is just a dummy switch similar to the AMT switch in an Intel BIOS) as it is integral to boot.
:O3x02L: R16000 700MHz 8GB RAM kanna
:Octane: R12000 300MHz SI 896MB RAM yuuka
:Octane2: R12000A 400MHz V6 2.5GB RAM
:Tezro: Quad R16000 700MHz V12 8GB RAM murasaki
:Indy: (Acclaim) R4600 133MHz XL Graphics 32MB RAM
:Indy: (Challenge S) R4600 133MHz (MIPS III Build Server)

I am probably posting from yangxiaolong, HP Z230 with Xeon E3-1230v3, 16GB RAM, GeForce 750ti, and running NetBSD and Windows 8.1 Embedded.
Owner and operator of http://irix.cc

User avatar
commodorejohn
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby commodorejohn » Wed Jan 03, 2018 1:13 pm

jan-jaap wrote:
commodorejohn wrote:This was down to the IME or I'll eat my hat.

Start eating, it has something to do with speculative execution from userspace resulting in leaking information from more privileged protection rings and/or defeating KASLR : https://www.theregister.co.uk/2018/01/0 ... sign_flaw/

Good thing I don't own a hat.
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/SH-09/MT-32/D-50, Yamaha DX7-II/V50/TX7/TG33/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/ARP Odyssey/DW-8000/X5DR, Ensoniq SQ-80, E-mu Proteus/2, Moog Satellite, Oberheim SEM

User avatar
uunix
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1989
Joined: Sun Mar 27, 2011 12:48 pm
Location: Stourbridge / England / UK

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby uunix » Wed Jan 03, 2018 1:49 pm

commodorejohn.. number of posts.. 666.. number of the beast... the same!! You do the maths..
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Hey Ho! Pip & Dandy!
:Tezro: :Octane2: :O2: :Indigo: :Indy:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

User avatar
commodorejohn
Posts: 682
Joined: Tue Oct 02, 2012 1:22 pm
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby commodorejohn » Wed Jan 03, 2018 2:10 pm

667 now!
Computers: Amiga 1200, DEC VAXStation 4000/60, DEC MicroPDP-11/73
Synthesizers: Roland JX-10/SH-09/MT-32/D-50, Yamaha DX7-II/V50/TX7/TG33/FB-01, Korg MS-20 Mini/ARP Odyssey/DW-8000/X5DR, Ensoniq SQ-80, E-mu Proteus/2, Moog Satellite, Oberheim SEM

User avatar
vishnu
Donor
Donor
Posts: 3361
Joined: Sun Mar 18, 2007 3:25 pm
Location: Minneapolis, Minnesota USA

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby vishnu » Wed Jan 03, 2018 3:35 pm

So wait, every Intel x86_64 CPU for the last 10 years has this flaw, even the newest ones? I was just about to buy an i5-8600K, is Intel going to offer fixed CPUs that fit the same socket? They don't appear to be too forthcoming with whatever they've got in mind from here on out...
Project:
Temporarily lost at sea...
Plan:
World domination! Or something...

:Tezro: :Octane2:

User avatar
Raion-Fox
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1597
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:01 pm
Location: near King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby Raion-Fox » Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:16 pm

I would hold off Vishnu until we get more info.
:O3x02L: R16000 700MHz 8GB RAM kanna
:Octane: R12000 300MHz SI 896MB RAM yuuka
:Octane2: R12000A 400MHz V6 2.5GB RAM
:Tezro: Quad R16000 700MHz V12 8GB RAM murasaki
:Indy: (Acclaim) R4600 133MHz XL Graphics 32MB RAM
:Indy: (Challenge S) R4600 133MHz (MIPS III Build Server)

I am probably posting from yangxiaolong, HP Z230 with Xeon E3-1230v3, 16GB RAM, GeForce 750ti, and running NetBSD and Windows 8.1 Embedded.
Owner and operator of http://irix.cc

User avatar
bifo
Posts: 99
Joined: Sat Aug 20, 2016 8:02 pm

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby bifo » Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:18 pm

vishnu wrote:So wait, every Intel x86_64 CPU for the last 10 years has this flaw, even the newest ones? I was just about to buy an i5-8600K, is Intel going to offer fixed CPUs that fit the same socket? They don't appear to be too forthcoming with whatever they've got in mind from here on out...


Yes, and :lol: if you think Intel is going to try to replace 10 years worth of chips when they can just patch the OSes and let the owner take the performance hit. They've accused AMD and ARM of suffering from the same problem, something which AMD has flatly denied and ARM is being cagey on (which seems odd, ARM being a totally separate family line, but then Intel is a big customer...).

As far as I know, it's a flaw with the processor itself, while the IME is a chipset thing and wasn't put into most consumer-grade chips. The danger there was that it was in every server and its a black box, and AMD still has their own version of it with the same basic issue: they won't tell anyone anything about it. Last I heard on that was that the operating systems that run on both should be theoretically deletable because it was put there due to government security contract requirements and they, presumably, have something they've made in-house. One hopes.

User avatar
Raion-Fox
Donor
Donor
Posts: 1597
Joined: Thu Jan 30, 2014 5:01 pm
Location: near King George, Virginia
Contact:

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby Raion-Fox » Wed Jan 03, 2018 4:47 pm

bifo wrote:Yes, and :lol: if you think Intel is going to try to replace 10 years worth of chips when they can just patch the OSes and let the owner take the performance hit. They've accused AMD and ARM of suffering from the same problem, something which AMD has flatly denied and ARM is being cagey on (which seems odd, ARM being a totally separate family line, but then Intel is a big customer...).


Because AMD's stock rose 6% after it became public.

bifo wrote:As far as I know, it's a flaw with the processor itself, while the IME is a chipset thing and wasn't put into most consumer-grade chips. The danger there was that it was in every server and its a black box, and AMD still has their own version of it with the same basic issue: they won't tell anyone anything about it. Last I heard on that was that the operating systems that run on both should be theoretically deletable because it was put there due to government security contract requirements and they, presumably, have something they've made in-house. One hopes.


The Intel ME has been a part of all chips dating back to the Nehalem uarch Bifo. This issue we're seeing affects the branch prediction part of the CPU which has been a feature in Intel for more than a decade.

On another note it baffles me why people trust AMD so implicitly because they're as greedy and shady as Intel
:O3x02L: R16000 700MHz 8GB RAM kanna
:Octane: R12000 300MHz SI 896MB RAM yuuka
:Octane2: R12000A 400MHz V6 2.5GB RAM
:Tezro: Quad R16000 700MHz V12 8GB RAM murasaki
:Indy: (Acclaim) R4600 133MHz XL Graphics 32MB RAM
:Indy: (Challenge S) R4600 133MHz (MIPS III Build Server)

I am probably posting from yangxiaolong, HP Z230 with Xeon E3-1230v3, 16GB RAM, GeForce 750ti, and running NetBSD and Windows 8.1 Embedded.
Owner and operator of http://irix.cc

robespierre
Posts: 1667
Joined: Mon Sep 12, 2011 2:28 pm
Location: Boston

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby robespierre » Wed Jan 03, 2018 8:16 pm

The Meltdown attack specifically targets an Intel bug that fails to check uncommitted instructions for access violations before they can cause side effects (like cache loads). This is not the only way that the technique can be applied: a related attack was released by the same team, called Spectre, that causes side effects (like cache loads) using speculative execution and branch prediction. Most processors today use these techniques, so they are also vulnerable to the same family of attacks.

The Meltdown attack is more serious because it allows kernel and physical memory to be read by the attacker's code. Spectre merely allows access to memory within the same process as the attacker, which is primarily a problem for processes that run untrusted JIT code like web browsers.

For Intel to simply replace 10 years of its installed product is not enough. Switching to AMD is not enough. I think this may finally be the goad that makes people take new computer architectures like The Mill seriously.
Attachments
spectre.pdf
spectreattack.com
(128.78 KiB) Downloaded 16 times
meltdown.pdf
meltdownattack.com
(184.13 KiB) Downloaded 20 times
:PI: :O2: :Indigo2IMP: :Indigo2IMP:

User avatar
Trippynet
Donor
Donor
Posts: 889
Joined: Thu Aug 15, 2013 6:22 am
Location: Aberdeen, Scotland, UK

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby Trippynet » Thu Jan 04, 2018 1:25 am

Raion-Fox wrote:I do not buy AMD because I cannot take the performance hit (Benchmarks of Ryzens show abysmal single thread performance compared to Haswell Xeons) and because I do not wish to support their poor quality chips.


I have to confess to being a bit perplexed by this. First of all, it's rather unfair to compare a consumer CPU with a professional/server grade CPU that costs twice as much. Comparing instead to Kaby Lake Core i7s, a Ryzen 7 1800X is only marginally behind a Core i7 7700K in single threaded performance with CPU-Z, and is faster than an i7 6600K at single-thread performance (and this is Skylake, not Haswell). Whilst I'd agree that Intel's latest chips are therefore faster at single threaded performance overall, I'd hardly call Ryzen's single core performance "abysmal". Multi-threading is increasingly important these days, and Ryzen does score very well here (my current system absolutely motors through video encoding with Handbrake for example).

Secondly, your claim of "poor quality chips" - how exactly? I presume you're aware that the Meltdown flaw affects Intel chips but not AMD ones? In this case, I'd put that down as a significant black mark against the quality of Intel's chips, rather than AMD.

Personally, I take a neutral approach - I've owned plenty of AMD and Intel systems over the years and I wouldn't call either of them "poor quality". Both companies have had their ups and downs over the years, but good competition is healthy for the industry.
Systems in use:
:Indigo2IMP: - Nitrogen: R10000 195MHz CPU, 384MB RAM, SolidIMPACT Graphics, 36GB 15k HDD & 300GB 10k HDD, 100Mb/s NIC, New/quiet fans, IRIX 6.5.22
:Fuel: - Lithium: R14000 600MHz CPU, 4GB RAM, V10 Graphics, 72GB 15k HDD & 300GB 10k HDD, 1Gb/s NIC, New/quiet fans, IRIX 6.5.30
Other system in storage: :O2: R5000 200MHz, 224MB RAM, 72GB 15k HDD, PSU fan mod, IRIX 6.5.30

User avatar
Irinikus
Posts: 580
Joined: Wed Apr 27, 2016 4:25 am
Location: Cape Town, South Africa

Re: Intel backdoor: not a bug, a feature (buy a new processor!!!)

Unread postby Irinikus » Thu Jan 04, 2018 3:20 am

Trippynet wrote:Personally, I take a neutral approach - I've owned plenty of AMD and Intel systems over the years and I wouldn't call either of them "poor quality". Both companies have had their ups and downs over the years, but good competition is healthy for the industry.


Agreed, it doesn't help to be a fanboy of any particular brand, if they drop the ball, drop them.

Buy whichever chip best suits your needs.
Image ................................... Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image ................................... Image Image Image Image Image Image Image Image
Image ... Image
Image ........................ Image
Image ........................ Image Image


Return to “Everything Else”

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests